Original Article
Abstract
References
Information
Purpose: This study investigates the aerodynamic stability of a cable-stayed bridge following the installation of a power distribution conduit and a mobile inspection car rail. The evaluation was performed by comparatively analyzing computational fluid dynamics (CFD) results from the original two-dimensional bridge cross-section model and a modified model incorporating these new facilities. Method: The fluid flow was modeled as an unsteady, incompressible flow, governed by the Navier-Stokes equations. Result: The CFD analysis of the modified cross-section yielded a drag coefficient of 1.48. This value represents an approximate 2.8% increase compared to the drag coefficient derived from the CFD analysis of the original cross-section without the additional installations. Conclusion: The calculated drag coefficient of 1.48 remains below the original design value of 1.52, which was used for the initial wind load computations. Consequently, the results confirm that the additional facilities do not necessitate an increase in the originally established wind load.
연구목적: 사장교의 2차원 단면 교량모델에 대한 원 설계 당시의 전산유동장 해석결과(CFD)와 교량에 배전관로 및 이동식 점검차 레일 첨가 시 2차원 모델의 결과를 상호 비교검토 하여 교량 첨가시설에 따른 사장교의 내풍안정성을 확인하였다. 연구방법: 기류의 해석조건은 비정상, 비압축성기류, 일정 물성치의 특성을 갖는 유동으로 가정하였고, 지배 방정식은 Navier-Stokes 방정식을 사용하였다. 연구결과: 사장교에 배전관로 및 이동식 점검차 레일의 첨가시설에 따른 변경 된 단면에 대한 CFD 해석결과 구해진 항력계수는 1.48로 확인되었고, 배전관로 및 이동식 점검 차 레일 설치 전 단면의 CFD결과에 비해 2.8% 정도로 항력계수 증가가 나타났다. 결론: 원 설계 당시 교량의 보강형 풍하중 산정 시 설계 적용치인 1.52에 비해 작은 값으로 검토 되었다. 실제 설계에 비해 더 작은 값의 항력계수를 갖게 됨으로 풍하중에 대한 추가적인 검토가 필요하지 않다고 판단된다.
- Baskaran, A., Kashev, A. (1996). Investigation of Air Flow around building Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Techniques. Engineering Structure, USA. 10.1016/0141-0296(95)00154-9
- Bregh. H. (1965). Theoretical and Experimental Results for the Dynamic Response of pressure Measure Systems. National Aero Research Institute, Netherlands.
- Ge, Y.J., Tanaka, H. (2000). “Aerodynamic flutter analysis of cable-supported bridges by multi-mode and full-mode approaches.” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol. 86, No. 2-3, pp. 123-153. 10.1016/S0167-6105(00)00007-6
- Holmes, J.D. (2001). Wind Loading of Structure. SPON Press, USA. 10.4324/9780203301647
- Hu, C., Zhou, Z., Yan, K. (2020). “Wind-induced stability of a cable-stayed bridge with double main spans of 1,500 m and a twin-box section.” Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 25, No. 1, 04019135. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001501
- Huh, T.N. (2020). “Wind-resistant safety reviews of cable-stayed bridge by wind tunnel tests.” Journal of the Korean Society of Industry Convergence, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 637-644.
- Hussain, N., Hornby, R., Minto, B., Carter, M., Kite, S. (2019). “Queensferry crossing, UK: Scheme, specimen and definition designs.” In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Bridge Engineering, Vol. 172, No. 2, pp. 92-112. 10.1680/jbren.18.00013
- Japan Society of Civil Engineers (2003). Wind Resistant Design of Bridge. Japan.
- Khan, R.A., Datta, T.K., Ahmad, S. (2005). “A simplified fragility analysis of fan type cable stayed bridges.” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Vol. 4, pp. 83-94. 10.1007/s11803-005-0027-6
- Kim, H.G. (2007). “Aerodynamic design procedure of a cable-stayed bridge based on buffeting analysis.” Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 27 No. 41, pp. 985-992.
- Larose, G.L., Stoyanoff, S., Dunn, B., Rowan, W. (2022). Aerodynamic Stability of Bridge Stay Cables—Dynamic Tests and Simulations. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Infrastructure Research and Development, USA.
- Lee, G.H. (2012). CFD Analysis Reports for Geobooksun Grand Bridge. MOCT, p.245.
- Lee, H.Y., Moon, J.H. (2021). “Aerodynamic characteristics evaluation of a cable‐stayed bridge section with a new-type hybrid fairing.” Shock and Vibration, Vol. 2021, 8899558. 10.1155/2021/8899558
- Niels, J.G., Christos, T.G. (2012). Cable Supported Bridges Concept and Design. John Wiley & Sons, United Kingdom, pp.109-112.
- Ogawa, K., Shimodoi, H., Ishizaki, H. (1992). “Aerodynamic stability of a cable-stayed bridge with girder, tower and cables.” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol. 42, No.1-3, pp. 1227-1238. 10.1016/0167-6105(92)90129-X
- Wang, X., Li, Y., Song, W. (2018). “The aerodynamic stability of a new type of Multi-tower cable-stayed bridge with rhombic stiffening cables.” In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 1064, No. 1, 012018. 10.1088/1742-6596/1064/1/012018
- Yang, Y.X., Ge, Y.J. (2012). “Wind-induced vibrations and equivalent static wind loading for cable-stayed bridges.” In The Seventh International Colloquium of Bluff Body Aerodynamics and Applications, pp. 399-409.
- Zhou, R., Yang. Y., Ge, Y., Mendis, P., Mohotti, D. (2015). “Practical countermeasures for the aerodynamic performance of long-span cable-stayed bridges with open decks.” Wind and Structures, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp.223-239. 10.12989/was.2015.21.2.223
- Publisher :The Korean Society of Disaster Information
- Publisher(Ko) :한국재난정보학회
- Journal Title :Journal of the Society of Disaster Information
- Journal Title(Ko) :한국재난정보학회논문집
- Volume : 21
- No :3
- Pages :718-731
- DOI :https://doi.org/10.15683/kosdi.2025.9.30.718


Journal of the Society of Disaster Information






